09-03-2008, 12:57 AM
|
|
without exception
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Highway of Holiness
Posts: 198
|
|
|
Re: George Glass Sr/Response- "Mystery Solved" Thr
Regarding the PCI on the West Coast:
Because travel was very constrained, men found fellowship nearby. Also added to this was that the PA of JC did not have a strong presence on the west coast. In speaking to several men about this, they all find agreement that the PCI on the West coast was a “mixed bag” of doctrines. Some men were “saved at repentance”(SAR), some were Acts 2:38 salvation. Geographically speaking, the Northwest was more of the SAR, though there were Acts 2:38 strongholds throughout. In California it was a “mixed bag”. I spoke with one strong Acts 2:38 California elder (almost 80 now), and he said he was PCI because, “that’s all there was in my area”. Certainly the name affiliation (PCI or PAofJC) in those days dealt more with geographical fellowship than with doctrinal absolutes – at least on the West Coast!
Not even the Grapevine
Is a
Straightline
|
Threaded Mode
