Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
1) The natural inclination is to label the other shooter as the criminal. I am attempting to show that the other guy in a positive light-- for all we know he really a good guy who suffered a judgment lapse. But we are naturally inclined to not see him the shooter that way.
Bro, there was NO "other" shooter...there was THE shooter. Of course we look differently at the shooter than we do the person who most likely accidentally ran this guy off the road...
2) My basis for arguing that this idiot had malicious intent is the fact that he showed a lack of regard for the affects of his actions-- typical of other idiot drivers that don't consider how dangerous their driving is to the general public.
3) That's not the proper response for the shooter or for us.
Arresting and charging the shooter will no way bring justice to the idiot who caused all of this in the first place.
If the idiot driver had been driving drunk, would that change this situation at all for you guys?
|
Bro, there was NO "other" shooter...there was THE shooter. Of course we look differently at the shooter than we do the person who most likely accidentally ran this guy off the road...
You seem to be having a real problem differentiating between the seriousness of a traffic accident and an intentional shooting.
Had the guy been driving drunk and ran the idiot shooter off the road, it still wouldn't warrant shooting him...
I understand his anger...what I don't understand is your seeming justification of his irrational response to that anger.
Yes, locking him up will bring justice...Most definitely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
How do we know it was inadvertent? Serious question.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Cindy,
The shooter acted irrational, but I can understand his anger.
|
Threaded Mode
