Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified
Well, pel? 
That's fun to say, btw.
Anybody want a peanut? (Only the wise will understand.) |
Yes I see your point, after re-reading Dordrecht's post it does seem to be confrontational toward Sherri's original post.
I guess you could look at it this way -
"Sherri, the ex-UPCer is gossiping and spreading scandalous tales about someone and won't even back it up..."
That's kind of the take I get from Dordrecht. The problem is: The blog is also from an "exUPCer" -so anything Sherri may say would be self deprecatory as she herself has indicated by her title selection.
So, the real "scandal" appears to be that Sherri is concerned about gossips gossiping about "exUPCers" in general and the "bad name" that gets hung on people. Hardly a scandal, in my opinion.
So we're back to the real problem: there is apparently an audience that wishes to read the "exUPC" pastor's wife's blog's PG-17 language and that audience has no material to read.
Threaded Mode
