Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowas
It seems we are at an impasse at this point.
To me the final and complete arbitrator would be Praxeas.
What does he say whose turn it is and which response should be the next response. and what questions should be answered at this point in the debate, if any.
Praxeas, Decide if you can on who should do what and who should do the other.
|
I already stated several times now and I PMd Bro Anderson. You can't always expect the opponent to answer the way you want. This isn't an interview. It's a debate and part of a good debate is not only being ready with your arguments but effectively demolishing your opponents argument, even if that includes pointing out he did not address certain issues.
It's not a time to give up. Continue with the debate. As I said already we will have a cross examination time. Then we will have a concluding remarks with no word limit and the those reading can decide who came out ahead.
The question is then, Did B Anderson represent his assertion (not an accusation) that the Christ of AFP is not the true Christ of Scriptures? Or was B Burk able to refute his assertions and or prove the Christ of AFP is indeed the Christ of the scriptures?
Nobody is required to answer or address any point at all but if those viewing are to judge based on what the goal was and one side avoids addressing the other sides point just to introduce red herring comments, then those judging have to conclude one side did not "win" based on what the debate was about.
I think both should finish the debate and THEN let the others decide,
Threaded Mode
