You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Ahhh, but you first denied it was true.

Here you go.

Bro. Epley, it all began here…



Because of this Bro. Benincasa asked…



Jason then responded…



So there you go, Bro. Epley, another AFP telling the truth about what’s found among Futurism.

WHILE SOME THINGS DID HAPPEN IN THOSE DAYS. He said it right there.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

You should have followed him and dogged him til the cows came home and he would have to put up or shut up INSTEAD you had your own discussion that did NOT relate to his material.

So, I should have stayed on subject, and should of answered him though he wasn't on subject, but I should not have interjected any scriptures in an attempt to get him on subject, and I was to do all of that in 600 words or less. How exactly do you suggest this to be done?


Also, you never answered what I asked you: But, for the record, can you PLEASE show where Bro. Anderson ever gave any evidence for what the apostles taught concerning the agreed subject?

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

WHILE SOME THINGS DID HAPPEN IN THOSE DAYS. He said it right there.

This, my dear readers, is called a diversion.

Try this again...

Originally Posted by Jason

I TAKE ALL OF MATTHEW 24 TO BE FUTURE, while some things did happen in those days, I believe the specific fulfillment will take place in the "end times". I DO NOT SEE A GAP IN ANY OF THE CHAPTERS YOU MENTION. I believe there is a gap in Daniel 9:27, which puts the AOD in the future, not 66AD, not 70AD.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

This, my dear readers, is called a diversion.

Try this again...

So you make the letters small that clearly states "some things did happen in those days?" And you talk about diverson?

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

So you make the letters small that clearly states "some things did happen in those days?" And you talk about diverson?

And you ignore the large letters that clearly show you are mistaken??

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

And you ignore the large letters that clearly show you are mistaken??

I take them BOTH unlike my Preterist friends.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I take them BOTH unlike my Preterist friends.

No you don't. You take the one that agrees with YOU.

Bro. Epley, if you read all the questions asked him about this, you'll see that ALL of us (AFP's and Futurists) got the SAME THING, and it is not what you see. His wording is REAL CLEAR. Maybe you're just too interested in being correct and that is causing you to not be able to see it?

[TK Burk]

Bro. Epley?

Originally Posted by TK Burk

But, for the record, can you PLEASE show where Bro. Anderson ever gave any evidence for what the apostles taught concerning the agreed subject?

[TJJJ]

I got Mr Smith and Mr Brown and then I got the run a round and finally Mr D came on the line.......

I said, he said, they said, we said,......

We still don't have our debate!

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

I got Mr Smith and Mr Brown and then I got the run a round and finally Mr D came on the line.......

I said, he said, they said, we said,......

We still don't have our debate!

...at least not "offically"!