Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Do you understand what it means to be latent? There is no contradition since the Divine attributes were LATENT in him. In other words though in Person He is the I AM and though he possesses the Divine essence from where the Divine nature is derived, those attributes were LATENT in Him...in other words he was able to fully function through the Human nature only. That effectively enabled him to function as though he were a human being, like you and I, with a human mind and will distinct from the Divine.
That is why I posted after you posted all those verses, that you were making my case. Those verses don't prove the Deity was NOT latent in Him.
|
Your Christology needs a LATENT divine nature (almost as if his God-brain was turned off) to make the words of the Son of God reconcile with your view. Hey, if your theology needs a human philosophical invention, just invent one!
Of course I can not (and did not) provide those verses to prove that something was NOT LATENT...that is really just too crazy for me to even think about! I apologize for responding to some specific aspect of your post.
Good night Prax.
Note to self: when talking to Prax always.....
......oh well, just don't.