Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
Brother, you are a riot. I asked for a YES or a NO. Oh well, at least you make things interesting.
|
No the riot is YOU, you make your statements and say what I believe is false? Then you fail to be able to explain these three chapters in a forum that allows you freedom to present any amount of discussion on any topic concerning eschatology? You say that I'm a riot? Have you ever seen an Atheist debate a Theist? An Evolutionist debate a Creationist? You are making me chuckle (a parson term) if those topics aren't broad I don't know what is. Take my challenge, I promise, for anyone that can condemn me and my family to a devil's hell over what I believe, should be able to PROVE that
Matthew 24,
Luke 21, and
Mark 13 is future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
Okay, let me make this plain, as others already have posted on this thread.
A debate on 3 chapters is to broad.
|
Others who? Other Preterists? Other Apostolics who believe in Fulfilled Eschatology? Are those the ones?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
I want to debate the main point of preterism. Is the coming of Christ past or future. If you are so hung up on Matthew 24. We can let Matthew 24:27-31 be our foundational scripture and go from there. Why can you not commit to this? |
I'm hung up? I'm not hung up on anything but the key chapters that prove the eschatology of Christ. Everyone who teaches eschatology MUST deal with these chapters.
I suggest you fit them into your debate schedule.
You will affirm that
Matthew 24,
Luke 21 and
Mark 13 is future and I will confirm that they are past.
Thank you and I will see you in the debate thread.
In Jesus name
Brother Benincasa
www.OnTimeJournal.com
Threaded Mode
