Robber Killed-- Pharmacist Charged

[scotty]

Originally Posted by Jaxon

DA David Prater said that he thought the gunman would recover from the wound to the head. Now think about that for a second. He is making that assesment from looking at the guy (or a picture). Now if I look at someone who has been shot in the head and say I think the guy would recover from that, don't you think it would have to be either super ficial or at least easy to see it's not serious. Most times when a person is shot in the head you can't make that assessment. So if the DA makes that assessment do you think the pharmacist could see that as well.

Don't know, I do know this. He himself is reported to have stated the boy was unconsious. He also appeared that way on the tape. Also, the coroner will be able to tell you if the shot was survivable.

Originally Posted by Jaxon

And one important difference between this case and an accused child molester case where the accused is not allowed to be around children. We are talking about a right guarenteed by the second amendment. And the DA even requested the man be allowed to carry his gun. He thought he needed it even though he charged him........I think that shows the fallacy of the charge being leveled.

No sir, you lose your rights when you can not handle the responsability that must come with them. The DA was either seriously flawed for that or feared the pharmacist may face retaliation by the family or friends .

Look , Im not against what he was trying to do , but somewhere he went too far, he crossed a line .