Let's see, "how could I possibly know if I'm deluded" is (to me) a logical answer, and a good choice even for those NOT deluded. Yet isn't this choice more or less merely agreeing with a definition of "delusion," and begging the question? Therefore, the choice "Yes, I'm deluded" is also bad even if true, because you're not supposed to recognize your own delusion. If you're not supposed to recognize own delusion, then "No, not deluded" is bad for the same reason, even if someone could be so arrogant about EVERYTHING they believed. So, that leaves "other" by default. But if "other" is the best vote for me, then I'm supposed to EXPLAIN my "other" vote. But I am rather now explaining my "How do I know?" vote, with no chance to explain "other", since it's not my vote.
This is my best attempt at pleasing Timmy, hope he likes it.
Marcbee
Um, but... well, you started by explaining why "how could I...." is a good vote (nothing wrong with agreeing with the definition of deluded!), then why "Yes" is also bad.
__________________
Hebrews 13:23 Know ye that our brother Timothy is set at liberty
Um, but... well, you started by explaining why "how could I...." is a good vote (nothing wrong with agreeing with the definition of deluded!), then why "Yes" is also bad. 
Threaded Mode
