Quote:
Originally Posted by GraceAmazing
I agree with this statement and I understand where Maple Leaf is coming from...that's why we left the UPC. We couldn't preach the standards message anymore and we didn't want to be a hinderance to the UPC. So, we left. It costs us a lot, but it was worth it!
If Rex Johnson doesn't preach what the UPC believes and endorses, he should probably find another Ministerial Fellowship to join up with! That being said, I would love it if things would change in the UPC, but I just don't see that happening. Now people are leaving in groves...it's sad and scary and exciting at the same time!
I personally love TFT and Rex Johnson! I think they are GREAT men of God and I believe wholeheartedly that they love God and they want what is the best for God's children!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrowingPains
I think MapleLeaf is saying, if you're going to sign it, believe it. Otherwise, show what you believe by refusing to sign it. If more people did that, things would change (for better or for worse, depending what is better or worse to you).
|
I do not agree. When the fundamental doctrine has provision made for different views, how much more should we admonish "all the brethren that they shall not contend for their different views to the disunity of the body."
There needs to be room for the RJ's in the UPC - even if it means returning to the old paths and changing the tolerance level and language to what it once was.