Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
Then it's not an "Intentional Confrontation" ... more like "Intentional Innuendo."
IF true ... I'd be upset with PM labeling TFT, RJ and others from the meeting as false prophets - regardless if done by name or innuendo. I'd have more respect if done by name, however, instead of hiding behind innuendo.
|
No, there are many ways to be confrontational, and both can be effective when used in the right way. Had PM went on a list of names, you'd really have yourself in a hizzy fit about what is appropriate for a campmeeting.
False prophet? Who said that? I think he warned about the damage, history and vulnerability of secret meetings. He made his point loud and clear, lest others are asked to participate in such meetings (and I'm sure that was his point).
Now, point aside, I'm not sure it was "secret", though certainly exclusive. But we've all been the kid without the birthday invitation at one time or another, right?
2 issues are here on this post:
1) Was the Detroit meeting okay?
2) Was PM in-bounds with this comments at the MS campmeeting?
For me #1 depends on many factors that I simply don't know about the meeting. And #2 is yes, he was okay to do what he did at the campmeeting. Doesn't mean I agree with his judgement, but he was perfectly within bounds.
Threaded Mode
