Quote:
Originally Posted by RandyWayne
Interesting question but to me the answer is easy.
If it is debate, then it is all good.
If it is discussing/debating an incident which is public knowledge on account of it being in the news (public newspaper or church press) then it is also fair game to talk about.
However, when someone comes on saying that THEY have personal knowledge -and then proceed to tell us how they have PROOF but then continually refuse to provide it, then I have a real problem with that.
|
I think it also extends further into anti-organizational bashing of any stripe. That goes beyond sound debate, scriptural exegesis, etc. JMO....
Quote:
|
If it is discussing/debating an incident which is public knowledge on account of it being in the news (public newspaper or church press) then it is also fair game to talk about.
|
I'll have to think about that, although, I'm sure public knowledge appears to be acceptable - I just wonder why we would feel comfortable doing that on an open board. That still has the feel of "a busybody in other men's matters".
Threaded Mode
