http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/abc_summary.htm
I realize it is a political issue. But it is still in the realm of health. when we add money, social engineering should want to reduce activities that turn into costs.
If we break women into 3 groups. Never have been pregnant, have had a baby and have had a pregnancy artificially terminated. We see that giving birth causes a reduction in cancer rates. I was just a little indirect, but now we see that cancer rate starts going upward in the ages of the 50's. Now if i give you samples in Latin america where abortion is forbidden, some still leave and have abortions. But we still see in Latin america where it is legal, the already have a lower life expectancy by that meaning they die of other causes before getting cancer. So then we go to meta studies and age ajustments. If we add a family history of cancer to having had an abortion, we almost attain a death sentence.
Quote:
|
The world’s first known abortion-breast cancer settlement was reported in Australia in 2001. An Australian woman who’d obtained an abortion sued her physician for medical malpractice. She claimed he failed to inform her of the research linking abortion with breast cancer and the possibility of emotional damage which she might suffer as a result of her abortion. Although she hadn’t developed breast cancer, her attorney, Charles Francis, said she nevertheless received a significant sum. [Patrick Goodenough, “First Case Linking Abortion-Breast Cancer Settled,” Cybercast News Service, www.CNSNews.com, January 4, 2002]
|
Now with Obamascare, he has it written that we can't sue the federal government for malpractice. But they won't disclose risks.
This is one piece of motivation to remove all abortion related laws at the state level.
Threaded Mode
