Quote:
You apparently do not understand the meaning of apologetics. And, still waiting on your all important credentials!
So, you place history on the same plane as Scripture? I agree [for about the 3rd time now] that history is a "help" [seize on that word], but you entirely side-stepped my comments on 1st century historical records. Tell us Jeffrey, how concrete is the historical narrative of the 1st century outside of the recognized canon?? Answer pls.:__________?
I'll be nice. But you're making this more comical when you don't admit you're just making things up.
Ughhh, YOU're the one who apparently does not even know what apologetics is! Would you mind defining this term for us? Sheeesh, just gets worse & worse eh'........................
|
I fully understand what apologetics are: providing a reasoned defense (in our context) of the faith. This has nothing to do with our conversation. Please tell me how it does. And what in God's name is an "apologetic trick?"
Yes, this is getting more and more comical. Spicing the thread up for a moment, I suppose. I ask again: what are your hermeneutic credentials?
Maybe we should get back to your primary list of points. Things were going better that way. It was when you got puffy-chested and thought you were the Great AFF Scholar, but started throwing out words you didn't understand, and saying things that were categorically false.
Threaded Mode
