Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother David
I am curious why you denied saying that earlier.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light
I have never said or even hinted that I believe the damming doctrine that is subscribe to by many on this site. I have never once said one can go to heaven without the name of Jesus in baptism, with out the Holy Ghost by the evidence of speaking in tongues.
There are those that say they believe Acts 2:38, that each step must be obeyed, that one must speak in tongues to go to heaven yet they will run with any dog that will trot. I remember Sammie Kline a powerful man of God. A man that would say be healed and right before your eyes the person would be healed. I am not talking about headaches but tumors as big as basketballs, arms crooked and drawn straighten right before our eyes. A man who stopped preaching the truth because there was not enough money.He began going to easy believe, saved at repentance churches for money.
I'm sorry I refuse to prostitute my self for money or by compromise and worship with those that claim to be apostolic yet preach a different message than Peter preached.
|
Now I'm wondering why you appear to have forgotten what it was that you deny saying that you said at the first.
You said that the woman with no tongue and no lower jaw could NOT have received the Holy Ghost because she could not have spoeken in tongues.
When I reminded you of having said that, you denied it and said that I would not be able to produce your original post because you would never have said
that.
http://apostolicfriendsforum.com/sho...&postcount=108
I then produced the post and your response was something like... "Yeah, I've said that all along."
I then asked why you denied having said that (in that post above) and you now say, "Nope, she's hell bound..."
Why did you deny sending her to hell in this post? Explain this post:
http://apostolicfriendsforum.com/sho...&postcount=108
Threaded Mode
