Quote:
Originally Posted by rgcraig
It was a picture of a bull that would be posted as "an award" when someone stated something ridiculous or they were "full of bull." My argument is we all know what is usually said after bull.
There were ministers from the con camp that thought nothing of it. And they say us liberals don't have any standards.......sure, we do!
|
Got it. Is it literally "Bull" that we're full of because that doesn't really make any sense. It seems like it would make more sense if we said someone were full of something that's actually
in the bull and the bull emits. Maybe I'm over-thinking it.
Threaded Mode
