Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey
Homosexuality is immoral.
Two fathers sets up a standard in a child's mind that is inherently immoral. I agree.
When you say "dangerous" can you please clarify?
Also, how do you define "family?" Blood relationship? Marriage? Shared household? Curious.
I'm aware of Dobson's studies cited about the psychological benefit of one dad, one mother. But let's face it -- our society has the signs of moral depravity written all over it. Look how many single mom's are raising children in the ghettos. Look at how many divorces and blended families there are in the suburbs. It's alarming.
The Libertarian in me says we should be legally accomodating for all people, while the believer in me seeks to influence this world with the Gospel -- not just so that they can be moral people, but so they can see a more fuller way of living life, and live with understanding God's grace and generosity, knowing He is Lord.
|
I fully understand there are marriage definitions that are not blood relationship. (and also that those are generally less than ideal) But I do believe official references to homosexuality like this one are an obvious attempt to normalize it while at the same time diminishing the importance of God's ideal.
Dangerous because he will likely view sodomy as something other than an abomination.
Also because he is in a house with two perverted men who most likely support causes like the North American Man/Boy Love Association. (they work closely with the gay and lesbian groups)
Practicing homosexuals have a much higher risk of disease, drug use and premature death.
The libertarian in me does not want to remove the child without hard evidence. But the libertarian in me also believes I have the right say it is immoral, deviant and dangerous choice - and one better not confirmed or approved by the church, government or society at large.