Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On
Now, we have heard that SHE filed for divorce and Danny mentioned she was 7 years older. There just seems to be some other things, we don't know, that we would have to factor into this situation.
I am just saying that it doesn't appear to come up clean for her.
There is also the statement that she made, which is cited in the news article:
Baron could elaborate on that further.
I also noted in the case filed that she is seeking damages for having been under duress and needing medical attention. I rolled my eyes on that one. Typical, IMO.
I also noted that there was mention of other things said on the tape and over the pulpit which we do not get to read or hear. Just a couple of snippets - the worst snippets. I would want to hear or read all the comments.
This is my overview, which I didn't take the time to put out yesterday. It was true when I told Stephen I had not read the article. I had, in fact, skimmed over the highlights, and felt I got the gist of what was going on. Even after reading it thoroughly and every link listed at Spiritual Abuse, I come away with the same opinion - no one is innocent in this case - neither pastor, ex-husband nor the ex-wife.
|
First, I would point out that her as the Plaintiff in the case in many jurisdictions is not absolute proof that she was the one wanting the divorce. An example from DC is that if a couple were filing for an uncontested divorce and she was the party filing out the paperwork they would tell her to list herself as the Plaintiff. He would file an uncontested Answer as the defendant.
She asked for very little in damages, I think she was at about $300 when the complaint was filed. If she was seeing a counselor and distressed about what was said this could qualify. Let me tell you beyond a shadow of doubt, that someone that has been through this would have very serious emotional stress, and it would not be uncommon to see a doctor for anxiety in a situation like this.
Threaded Mode
