Cajun, yes, you are typing very clearly.
I'm still amazed at the number of folks who just want to endlessly hammer on a young lady for her choice of swimwear, while giving a complete pass to the bishop of the house, the man who is supposed to be blameless. I mean, really! Is "two wrongs don't make a right" still in effect?
An excerpt of something you wrote yesterday in this thread, which I think, shows impecible wisdom (probably because I share your view).
1)The pastor violated the law
2)The pastor did not bridle his tongue
3)The pastor did not excercise wisdom or sound judgement
4)The pastor deliberately stretched the definition of aldultry in order to justify a divorce and subsequent relationship which violate the Bible and UPCI edict.
5)On any one point above, one would be within ones right to question whether this pastor is indeed, at this time, following Christ and therefore is to be followed
6)With all 4 points above being true, it is, in my opinion, the duty of all involved to question this man's qualifications to remain a pastor. If the board wont question it, then each individual member must decide if they wish, by remaining a member, to be implicitly agreeing with these practices.
Few, would dare admit these truths.
Threaded Mode
