New Bar at Gound Zero

[Twisp]

I've listed some of his ties already. I won't spent more time because you don't really care.

No, Buchanan wouldn't be because he doesn't skirt the issue and will flat out say that Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations. We don't get that from Rauf. When posed the question, Rauf tells Aaron Klein at WABC radio, "Look, I'm not a politician. The issue of terrorism is a very complex question." LOL! Right, Rauf!

You have not provided facts on any of his ties. You have listed what YOU thought, but no facts. Still waiting on those.

Let's see, we have the landing gear from one of the planes that crashed at the Twin Towers breaking off, going through the roof of the Burlington building, crashing all the way to the basement and Moore equates that to, merely, "a guardrail on the highway where a fatality occurred." I'm sure you could ask the families of the 3,000 they lost at Twin Towers whether that was rather insulting.

Apparently there was not enough support to save it. What else was the committee supposed to do?

They could have named it anything else, but they didn't. It does have significance, whether you want to see or agree with it or not.

Um, they did name it something else. Park 51.

An observant citizen, I have the right to question it.

But you are not questioning. You are saying they should not be allowed to peaceably assemble somewhere in a religious manner. That is unconstitutional.

Facts are scary things. And this is the creeping in of Sharia that you want to, willingly, overlook. You can't refute it.

You have given me nothing to refute. Again, your own opinions.

Nice try. The NT brings us to a position and place of redemption and restoration. A change from the OT laws, which have been done away. Don't you wish Islam would do the same? They have no provision for it.

Yeah, I just needed to fill a bulletin point. lol

Uh, let's try that again. I'll walk you through it - Raul says that the funding for the Cordoba mosque will come from "here", i.e. America. He then tells a London paper that Muslim nations would ALSO fund this project. If you missed that, I suggest a reading comprehension course. And please study, Taqiyya. It means - liar, liar, pants on fire.

Where did he say he would NOT be receiving funding from the Middle East? Certainly not in the article you provided. The article YOU provided said he would fund it from here, AS WELL as the Middle East. No lies there. Simply two places that funding would be coming from.

The majority of Americans do not agree with you. And, obviously, you haven't looked into this any further than you wanting to argue for the sake of arguing, which is your normal MO. So, we've come to the end of our little discussion being at an impasse.

Again, since the majority of Americans disagree with something, we should ignore the Constitution? A strong stance to take there.