Speaking In Tongues Does Not Equal Salvation.

[BroGary]

Originally Posted by Jason Badejo

So how do you define correct doctrine? With a tract? There is a real lack of scriptural exegesis on this thread an a hundred more like it on AFF in which folks come on with guns blazing claiming if you haven't spoken in tongues, you're not saved. Yet very few have offered much of a scriptural argument, and when they do offer scripture, it is easily rebutted with a more solid hermunetic, and then NOT replied to. (ex. my response to your quoting of Mark 16:17, and your following silence)

Strange you quote Paul, and yet dispute his writings in Romans.

How do you worship God in Spirit? By running around, by shouting, by speaking in tongues?

What about in TRUTH? By teaching things that are such hidden truth that they are not even in the Bible? Such as the list of MUSTS that you did not yet reply to.

Elemntary [Context], my dear Watson, elementary [context].

Sorry, but you are just so very wrong, and if you lead people to believe that obeying Acts 2:38 is not a must, then you are risking the eternity of precious souls.

You seem like you are stubbornly bound in your error, so why should I repeat in detail to you the same basic things I have wrote in past discussions when you seem determined to stay in your error.

Anyone who is truely open and hungry for truth and will look at what ALL the scriptures saying conerning salvation they will indeed see that believing, repentence, baptism in Jesus name, and receiving the Holy Ghost are ALL an absolute MUST :-)