Speaking In Tongues Does Not Equal Salvation.

[jfrog]

Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

If receiving the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues is required for salvation then every single person that has believed and been baptized must receive the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues or else Jesus was wrong about how he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved (for there would be some that believed and were baptized but not saved). Therefore, all I need to find is one example of a person that believes and was baptized but never received the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues to disprove that receiving the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues is required for salvation.

It's amazing how Mark 16:16 (one of the most cited 3 stepper scriptures in support of water baptism being salvational) actually disproves the 3rd step of the 3step doctrine (receiving the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongues being required for salvation).