Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
You haven't answered or responded to a single thing I've said since last night, Ninny.
The question about the composition of the Bible's creation accounts that Jason asked is fair - if asked by anyone else. Why don't you respond to last night's "three chambered heart" debacle? You really muffed that one.
With your "Ivy League" studies in genetics (as you claimed to have but cannot prove) you should have immediately known about the expression of the gene that determines whether a heart will be amphibian or mammalian - or something in between like a reptilian heart structure.
... but you don't have a clue about thing related to genetics other than that it's a word to be thrown around. You're just another of a long line of "Young Earth Creationist" frauds that have plagued the church since Henry Morris invented the deceit back in the 1960s.
|
Wow
You are extremely defensive about the change of a 3 chambered heart into a 4 chamber model.
No proof? No evidence?
Just a fairy tale?
Quote:
|
The reptile lung, with its bidirectional air flow, could not have evolved into the bird lung with its unidirectional flow, because it is not possible for there to have been an intermediate model between them.
|
Breath taking.When you get a secular education, they leave a lot to the imagination.
Threaded Mode
