Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
No one has made "taken" and "judgment" to be synonymous ... Praxeas. Your word fallacy has ignored an entire passage in Luke 17 that deals with judgment ... with zero mention of the elect or angels ...
I don't know where to start with you ... because history teaches me that this will lead to a circular rabbit trail.
Sufficed to say prolambano has multiple meanings ...
to take before
to anticipate, to forestall
to take one by forestalling (him i.e. before he can flee or conceal his crime)
surprise, detect
http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/gr...gi?number=4301
Dumbfounded, really ... and almost disappointed but if this proof text verse is that important to you to keep your rapture theology in tact ... HAVE AT IT.
Even if your choice is to deliberately ignore witness and context ... you stick with the word fallacy, good man. Wooden literalism ALERT.
Galatians 6:1
Brethren, even if anyone is caught (prolambano) in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted.
This is almost too easy. |
First of all, just because
Luke 17 fails to mention the elect is no reason to take our magic markers and remove them from the text in math
I have not stuck with one thing and ignored another. I have examined the context of both Luke and Math and pointed out the differences grammatically
BTW the comparison wa not "taken" with "judgement", but "
to receive near, that is, associate with oneself
familiar or intimate act or relation)
to
to lift; by implication to take up or away
and to the noah event where the first thing that happend was Noah was entered into the Ark, separating him and his family from the sinners and the sinners are destroyed
but don't stop at Mat 24, continue on to Mat 25 where the 5 wise virgins are taken and the 5 foolish left behind.
BTW the first comparison was done by raven to compare those taken to those destroyed by the flood
Threaded Mode
