Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
I get a kick out of the claim that "God created using evolution" when everything about evolution is the exact OPPOSITE of what the Bible says.
|
Quite a number of believers and believing scientists don't really "get a kick" out of the ignorance displayed by Fundamentalist literalism, they seem to just feel sad for those folks.
Since neither you nor coadie has had the courage to even try and address your faulty views on the Bible's use of genealogical genre -
why don't we all agree that the genealogies are not literal?
DO YOU AGREE?
If not, then
MAN UP!
"1) Show us how Zerubbabel could possibly be literally descended from the paternal lines of both Solomon and Nathan, the sons of King David.
(See Matthew 1; Luke 3; 1 Chronicles 3; Haggai 1:1-2:23 and Zechariah 4:6-14)."
Literally, these genealogies contradict on such a fundamental level that you'd have to throw out the entire Bible if you stick with your's and coadie's interpretation.
Fact: You guys just don't pay attention to the Bible. It's just some sort of fetish for you. You don't even pay attention to what is written on the pages of this Book.