A Relevant Holiness Message

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by triumphant1

I did end up watching both sermons. RM condemned the use of a rock song for a sermon illustration very pointedly. He said God was jeolous and "some things" (specifically the rock song) have NO PLACE in a worship service....condemning the preacher that did such a horrible thing.

The next week what was preached againt last week seems to be endorsed with laughter, and jumping, and clapping.....A James Brown spirit singing a James Brown tune in a worship service...

This has simpy made me curious as to how a pastor would address this contradiction...

I'm not uptight, nor am I fighting, nor am I condemning RM or GP. RM and I have been friends since we were teens. In the 90's we even preached youth camps together. I have no bone to pick, I'm just curious what his true response is in light of the two clips.

I am trying to listen to both messages by GP. A Strange Place Called Heaven cuts off during the Bible reading. Has done that twice now, so I won't be able to hear to entirety of that message.

It would be something I would want to do to get a feel of the situation for myself. In other words, that small part about James Brown, for a guest speaker, may not have been enough for RM to scrap the whole message from his website.

And I don't think he needs to come here and explain himself, being that Daniel has him in his sites and has for a long time.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by triumphant1

Yes I did watch both sermons. In the context of using a rock song or not...the edited clips are in context as far as I can tell.

RM condemned the use of rock songs for sermon illustrations and made another preacher look really bad in front of his congregation....one week later GP does exactly what RM preached against with the congregations approval...

No shafty editing....it happened just like that.

I don't know why I can't listen to the entire sermon. I didn't think the rock song was taken out of context. I'm just wanting to know what else he talked about. Perhaps, to some, they focused on other parts of the message, while Daniel focused on the Rock song, because it furthers his agenda against the UPCI.

[MissBrattified]

Originally Posted by notofworks

I do know about it, I was there, and I was on the platform with the CLC choir. Timothy Creel said ONE WORD and his career was toast.

Should that have been the case?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by notofworks

I do know about it, I was there, and I was on the platform with the CLC choir. Timothy Creel said ONE WORD and his career was toast.

He obviously was not a "made man".

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by DAII

Reading Mark Levin and Michael Savage doesn't qualify as reading.

I have never listened to Michael Savage and rarely read anything by Mark Levin. Sorry to disappoint.

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I don't know why I can't listen to the entire sermon. I didn't think the rock song was taken out of context. I'm just wanting to know what else he talked about. Perhaps, to some, they focused on other parts of the message, while Daniel focused on the Rock song, because it furthers his agenda against the UPCI.

NOW, did I mention the UPCI in this thread?

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I have never listened to Michael Savage and rarely read anything by Mark Levin. Sorry to disappoint.

Your IQ just jumped immeasurably.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by DAII

NOW, did I mention the UPCI in this thread?

That's funny, Daniel!

Do you know which message Poe preached that included the James Brown?

Beyond The Pull Of Normalacy or A Strange Place Called Heaven?

[triumphant1]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I am trying to listen to both messages by GP. A Strange Place Called Heaven cuts off during the Bible reading. Has done that twice now, so I won't be able to hear to entirety of that message.

It would be something I would want to do to get a feel of the situation for myself. In other words, that small part about James Brown, for a guest speaker, may not have been enough for RM to scrap the whole message from his website.

And I don't think he needs to come here and explain himself, being that Daniel has him in his sites and has for a long time.

If RM didn't come here to voice his doctrines, opinions, and beliefs quite often, and if he didn't already partake in dialog on this forum, I might would agree with you.

Secondly, his condemnation of the preacher (which was broadcast internationally on the internet) is what has the sites set on him.

Thirdly, If RM had not been so harsh on that unknown preacher in his sermon there would be nothing to discuss here....

Especially since I have been known to use secular songs to illustrate sermons...I have no problem with "I Feel Good...."

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by DAII

Your IQ just jumped immeasurably.

Oh thank you! I simply cannot live without your approval and devastated without it!!!!