Quote:
Originally Posted by Newman
1. I addressed the first issue in post #151.
2. The second issue with a rebellious child was not identified as an abomination to God.  |
Whether it was identified as an abomination or not is not important. If one is going to suggest that we are still under the moral law of the OT then anything contained in that law should be followed. In other words, if one is going to advocate that homosexuality is an abomination because the OT law said it was then we must also advocate the OT law teachings on stoning of rebellious children. How can we reconcile only following part of the law in this dispensation of Grace? We can't.
Threaded Mode
