Quote:
Originally Posted by DAII
I offer the commonly held definition of "Pentecostal" held by mainline Pentecostals and the greater religious community ... which holds that a basic tenet of classic Pentecostal belief is that tongues as the only universal initial evidence of Holy Ghost baptism .... for more than a century ... which you originally deemed "narrow" ....
and your rebuttal ... is some non-sourced mush by a single org-hopper?
Hoovie, you're Oneness ..... you're not a Pentecostal.
And you're logic, scary.
|
Did I really? In particular I said you were narrow to say one must run the aisles to be Pentecostal. That is scary logic IMO.
So in your view, if one speaks in tongues, yet believes there may be other evidences of the Holy Spirit, he is "nonPentecostal"? I think there have been many perhaps even entire organizations that have held to that. I would concede it's not the predominate view.
Did you read said "org-hopper's" thesis work? Fantastic.
Threaded Mode
