Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery
For any Christian who feels that they can discern what is true.
|
Brother Steven, the Bible doesn't tell us that discernment is a feeling. We don't have to read a book, an article, or listen to the Wyatt family to get a burning in the bosom. Whether it is true or not. We are told that the simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going
Proverbs 14:15. In the
Psalm 119:105 it says, thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Jesus tells us in
Matthew 15:14 let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch. Archeology Review isn't always correct and many things are debatable. Because that is archeology in a nutshell. The observation that archaeology involves debate and is not always definitively correct is a foundational principle of the field. Unlike subjects where controlled experiments lead to conclusive answers, archaeology relies on interpretation of incomplete evidence, which creates room for valid disagreements and new discoveries. The book series "Debates in Archaeology" is dedicated to ongoing theoretical and methodological arguments. Throwing a few copies of Biblical Archeological Review as if they were holy writ, will not convince the sincerely honest Christian. They certainly will not be testing it through "feelings"
Brother Steven, since you believe that the ark of the covenant was found by the Wyatt family. Could you please share with us why you believe this is true? Why did Jesus need to have His blood applied to the actual mercy seat of the ark? Do you happen to know the laboratory where Mr Wyatt had the sample of Jesus' blood tested? Why didn't this make world wide news? That the actual blood of Jesus Christ had been found and tested by a laboratory?
Maybe you could shed some new evidence to this discussion?
Threaded Mode
