Quote:
Originally Posted by missourimary
So are you talking about tongues or the outpouring of the Holy Ghost?
Signs didn't change. Dispensations changed. Tongues and interpretation wouldn't be discussed in Acts. Very few messages were recorded there. Acts is a historic record of major events.
If Saul and others in the OT had been filled with the Holy Ghost in the same way that people were filled in the NT, there would have been no need for the explanations in Acts 1:8, John 20:22, John 15:26, John 16:7, John 14:17, or John 7:38, or the prophesy in Joel 2:28, or Mt 3:11.
|
The dispensation changed. The High priest did an annual offering and attonement for sins. At GC every one was asked to one more time to ask for forgiveness of sins and get refilled.
I don't recall saying Saul was "filled with the Holy Ghost" in the same way.
1 Samuel 16:14 Now the Spirit of the LORD had departed from Saul ...
I just posted a verse. It says what it says. How could this "spirit" depart if it wasn't in Saul?