Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
It seems to me the government is put down when it doesn't have enough regulation to prevent some wrong (for example regulations on spending government money at a friends company instead of at walmart even if walmart is just a little cheaper) from taking place. However, right after it adds such regulation then it is complained that the government is inefficient.
I think that the more we try to place regulations on the government or government programs to prevent wrong then the less efficient those programs will be.
However, I think there is a "sweet spot" such that if we regulate to a certain degree and not past that degree that the government and government programs will be fairly unlikely to do something wrong and still fairly efficient.
Just something to think about.
|
The sweet spot is this...
The realization that further centralization of government demands, without fail, further inefficiency.
The control should be on local and state levels with much less oversight by the federal government. MUCH... MUCH... MUCH of the federal government needs to be abolished.
We need to see the incredible shrinking government.
Threaded Mode
