Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
It seems to me the government is put down when it doesn't have enough regulation to prevent some wrong (for example regulations on spending government money at a friends company instead of at walmart even if walmart is just a little cheaper) from taking place. However, right after it adds such regulation then it is complained that the government is inefficient.
I think that the more we try to place regulations on the government or government programs to prevent wrong then the less efficient those programs will be.
However, I think there is a "sweet spot" such that if we regulate to a certain degree and not past that degree that the government and government programs will be fairly unlikely to do something wrong and still fairly efficient.
Just something to think about.
|
"Fairly"? (just pretend there are a zillion question marks after that first one
)
The federal government needs to stay out of as much of the business, personal, economic world of Americans as possible.
Where exactly is this "sweet spot"? I say it stays within the boundries of the constitution, it doesn't get any "sweeter" than that.
Threaded Mode
