|
Re: The opposing scale of regulation and efficienc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digging4Truth
The sweet spot is this...
The realization that further centralization of government demands, without fail, further inefficiency.
The control should be on local and state levels with much less oversight by the federal government. MUCH... MUCH... MUCH of the federal government needs to be abolished.
We need to see the incredible shrinking government.
|
Centralization of government is inefficient? To some degree that is true, but a more centralized government has more access to information and can thus utilize that information to better implement solutions to problems than not as centralized government could. So it's not as clear cut as libertarians try to say.
It's much like artificial intelligence. Sometimes things are better off centralized and other times they are not. It really depends on the cost of communication and error checking going on between each level. It also depends on the amount of redundancy you desire. Less centralization will usually mean it's harder to address problems as they arise and harder to implement and find more efficient complex solutions to problems instead of the simpler solutions that lack of centralization often produces.
__________________
You better watch out before I blitzkrieg your thread cause I'm the Thread Nazi now!
Last edited by jfrog; 04-03-2011 at 04:26 PM.
|