Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
No, actually, I'm learning quite a bit. I'm glad I pushed it.
However, so far we've established that the priests wore pants and that three Hebrews in Daniel wore pants. However, that doesn't prove that women never wore them or a similar article of clothing.
|
Where is the verses which call for women to wear pants, or one verse wich has women wearing pants. CHristendom from start to stop had women wearing gowns, dresses, and skirts. Men wore hosen, trousers, and pants. Oddly enough the etymology of pants comes from the Greek origin which means "entirely lion like." Because the pants represented manhood, manliness. Christendom's understanding was men wore the pants and the women didn't. The phrase
"We know who wears the pants in Aquila's home" comes from 1931, so if pants were interchangeably normal occurrence back then, the phrase would have no meaning. Yet, even still to this day they use the term to indicate that your wife runs you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
Also:
If both texts in Leviticus and Daniel can be so specific so as to specify pants, why doesn't Deuteronomy 22:5? One could argue that it means any attire designated for a man. |
Why? Work on that and explain why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
However, there are many articles of clothing that are regularly worn by women throughout the UPCI and other "holiness" churches that were originally designed for and worn by men. Why don't you condemn these things?
|
I was never in the UPCI so why are we now talking about Hazelwood Missouri? Also who are you now accusing of condemning anyone? Do you go to the First Church of NPR?
Threaded Mode
