Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
Deuteronomy 22:5 is the theme of this discussion. I pointed to trousers being worn by men alone. Which would logically make trousers not female attire. Women shouldn't crossdress, and neither should you. 
|
Actually, you only showed two examples, by writers separated by many generations, wherein pants are mentioned on men. You provided no Scripture wherein pants are specifically condemned on women, or illustrating that women did not have an equivalent article of clothing. What you did prove is that the writers had adequate ability to specify such a prohibition linguistically, yet we don't see it.
All you proved is that the high priest wore trousers as did the three Hebrews.
Quote:
So women wearing pants is a perversion. OK. I think you are getting it. 
|
No. Only if they are cross dressing and pretending to be men. Imagine women dressed like lumberjacks, spitting and chewing tobacco, trying to seduce other women.
Not just a woman in trousers. Eskimo women must be hated by God according to you.
Threaded Mode
