Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
This entire thread has turned into a case in point. You guys are at war with the mere terminology they use. How could you possibly handle the reality of their plight, struggles, fears, failures, and the REAL situation they face.
I think... it's more comfortable to argue over the term "gay Christian" than to actually seek to get down into the nitty gritty of the issues they face and the reality of how they are perceived and received in our churches today.
|
Quite simply, no - It's not about what we are
comfortable with. Conversion changes people. If someone claims to be a "murdering Christian" or "fornicating Christian" they would get the same critique.
To claim they are "inactive" is a diversion.
BTW I am totally fine with the term Ex-gay Christian.
Threaded Mode
