|
Re: RDP
RDP did not present his message in a humble and meek way, but instead berated, criticized and mocked anyone who asked a question, that he insinuated he had answered "before". He did not accept most references and commentaries, except for those ones who may have agreed with his position. All of the other ones were moot... to him. And who gets to determine which ones are right or wrong? Apparently the "great RDP" is the only one who gets to determine which source is correct.
If RDP really was concerned about the eternal welfare of the poor souls on AFF, his attitude certainly didn't display that at all. He came off as condescending, proud, and arrogant, and a haughty attitude to anyone with a different opinion than of himself, and with a desire to prove himself right, more than a desire to rescue all these poor souls from hell fire and brimstone.
An attitude change from RDP and Pliny would have gone a whole lot farther in this debate, but they refuse to see and acknowledge that.... just look at all the wild emoticons displayed on almost every line of his posts. A serious debater doesn't need to resort to these kind of methods to bring forth his point.
|
Threaded Mode
