The Bible Is Secondary

[Luke]

Originally Posted by seekerman

Right. Your experience concludes there is absolute truth. My experience concludes there isn't absolute truth, only relative truth.

For example, I'm guessing that you believe God exists and that is absolute truth. I, on the other hand, believe God exists but that is relative to my sensory input. Absolute truths should be provable and the existence of God isn't a truth which can be proven.

Also, I'm speaking of philosophical beliefs, not scientific beliefs. Just wanted to make that clear. Throw a ball in the air on earth and it's an absolute truth that it will come down. That's different than philosophical truths.

Your basis is wrong. For example if what you are saying is true then there must be many multiple Jesus' in existence since you say He is not God and I say that He is God. If we are bith right then there are atleast two Jesus'. If we continue with this line of reasoning then Jesus both exist and does not exist since some say he does not exist and others say he does. If what you say is true then Jesus both rose from the dead while at the same time He never rose from the dead and His body was actually hidden by the disciples. Do you see the falacy of your argument. Two completely opposite views cannot both be true at the same time. Either one is true and the other wrong or both are wrong.