The 3000 in acts 2...

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Then what is the point in this topic? BTW you just committed another logical fallacy, shifting the burden of proof or trying to put this on me when it's your argument not mine, you should be in defense of.


No. It teaches anyone who repents and is baptized will receive the Spirit and tongues IF THEY WANT IT AND SEEK IT.

In other words those that hold to this doctrine of initial evidence do not believe you receive the Spirit and tongues the moment you repent and are baptized. In fact they don't even stress the absolute necessity of being baptized first.


Strawman argument.

Lol the burden of proof... So because I made the thread I have the burden of proof? I think there was a claim made long before I made this thread by oneneSs apostolics that tongues are the initial evidence of being baptized with the spirit. It is those people that actually have the burden of proof since they made the first claim. It's definitely not me for claiming that their claim isn't proven by the bible.