Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Daniel Wallace argues too that he believes it requires something on her head. He said it could be "hair" but does not believe it is hair. Nor does he believe it's necessarily a veil.
But grammatically speaking Paul is saying there is to be something on her head
|
How could he say that he doesn't believe that it is hair when
I Cor 11:15 states that a woman's long hair is given to her for a covering, even stating that it is a glory/dignity to her?
Threaded Mode
