02-14-2015, 03:23 AM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shazeep
amen. hard to be fully persuaded with all the ambiguity tho. Where you read "NT against Sabbath," i read reaffirmation for it 
ok and i think a lot of the prob w/A238 is that Pents have seen fit to append it, not the verse as it stands.
very nice. It might also be noted that @ "The Sabbath was made for man..." would have been a great spot for Christ to abolish the Sabbath, and yet He did not. Actually, there is a sense in which He had just wiped it out, legally speaking, but i think we are going to be hard-pressed to improve upon
"The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath,"
iow, let no one get you all plexed about your "days," and follow your heart.
Even for...gag...Easter, i guess. |
How does the Sabbath being made for Man mean it is always to be in effect? Lots of things were made for Man that are no longer on effect.
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
Threaded Mode
