Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 11-08-2015, 07:22 AM
shazeep shazeep is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: chasin Grace
Posts: 9,594
Re: Changing To Preterism from Rapture Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean View Post
And not ONE of you has answered a SINGLE question Loren.

All I get is more questions from preterists, as "answers" to my question.


Is there not a single preterist on AFF to explain this passage?...

Micah 4

4 But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it.

2 And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.

3 And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.



The closest thing to an answer I could get, is shazeep saying verse 5 is the explanation.

I think you preterists are really trying to hide your answer from me.

You guys have explained this passage, preterist style, in sealed rooms, long enough.

I only ask for a decent explanation to ALL 3 verses, concluding in verse 3.

You guys have said this passage is PAST prophecy, and was already fulfilled...Then prove it, by explaining it.

Unless you guys are sissy's.
It appears that you are still looking for proof, and facts, and wanting to pin this prophecy to a certain time period; but you are willing to ignore that prophecy is usually reflected in more than one time and place, and that verse 5, which you of course choose to omit, firmly debunks a futurist pov here--i don't get it.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Preterism is a false doctrine easter Deep Waters 81 12-24-2009 10:53 AM
PARTIAL Preterism VS. FULL Preterism mfblume Deep Waters 15 07-01-2007 10:41 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.