It's not unitarianism.
Universalism then; or whatever "everyone gets saved" is.
Then explain what it means and how you derive that.
well, to me it means that if
Acts 2:38 justifies one forsaking humility, condemning others who do not verbally agree with them, and disregarding the uncomfortable parts of Scripture that do not fit with their dogma, then i am looking for a better way.
I am trying to demonstrate it has nothing to do with my declaration. It has to do with what the Word teaches GOD SEES in it all. You won't touch that, though.
Really? Well then, let me touch it now. How will you demonstrate this?
And I am trying to get you to deal with what the bible says God demands FROM HIS perspective what saves or not.
You are privy to God's perspective? Do you really believe that all Muslims are lost to God? That God does not weigh their hearts, but instead requires that everyone must believe like Mike in order to be saved? Because you can--wait for it--prove it beyond a doubt using Scripture? While rejecting any other Scripture that provides a different perspective? And hence end up @ "God is love, and all Muslims--and for that matter pretty much everyone else--are lost?"
listen to yourself, man
That's the point. Who gives a flying flip? That's not my concern.
you misunderstand. i am asking you how one might prove me wrong, in that position.
Threaded Mode
