Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
1. All the commentaries, etc are wrong, and you are right with this rather novel interpretation? And they are wrong because they are guilty of eisogesis????
|
The Greek word means what it means: unfermented grape juice. And besides, not all commentators, etc. see it the same way. Take Gill, for example.
Quote:
|
2. God supernaturally endows a gift of speaking a language but can't give a gift of fluency?
|
Surely you witnessed some people speak in tongues for the first time? It often comes to them in stammering, disjointed sounding speech. Am I wrong, or the only one to have noticed this?
Quote:
|
3. David acted "like one of the base fellows" in worship, and said he would do worse, even.
|
David's behavior was not the same as someone with half a bottle of JD in them. It was of a different sort. And besides, what was said of David was an accusation from an embittered source (i.e. Michal), because David took her back as a wife but wouldn't visit her, as it were.
Quote:
|
4. Jews thought people would get drunk on Welch's?
|
The accusation in
Acts 2:13, in Greek, simply means "to be full of", not intoxicated.
Quote:
|
5. Nobody had alcoholic wine for Pentecost? Even though 51 days earlier they drank plenty of it for Passover?
|
The seasons and times of harvesting in ancient Israel were what they were. Grapes weren't harvested until summer, and sometimes, in late spring. Who said the wine at Passover was alcoholic, anyways?
Quote:
|
6. Xenolalia disproved from the text itself (see earlier posts on the thread).
|
You're right. I meant
heterais glossais. Amended above in post #84.
Quote:
|
7. So they weren't acting drunk and disorderly, they were acting very orderly and soberly by acting like kids on a sugar high?
|
You've misread me. The speaking in tongues seemed like the speaking of a child trying to speak a second language. There is nothing in the text that speaks of the disciples being disorderly, out of control, or at a loss of their mental or physical faculties.
People see whatever they want in the Bible to justify whatever it is they think they need.
Nice way to end a rejoinder. Not.