Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen
Go read every example but Chapter 2:18-24 shows a distinction. Because a angelic being can't be compromising with false doctrine, and not be in sin. And it's not talking about John so who is it talking about when its says "but unto you I say"? Strongs concordance says plainly pastor or messenger.
|
So, by your own post here it could be a messenger and NOT a pastor?
Would that be accurate?
Please answer this question!
Is there a 50% chance that you are right?
And a 50% chance that you are wrong?
Would this be fair to say?
Is 50% close enough to establish doctrine?
This is not horseshoes or hand grenades we're talking about here!
Line upon line, line upon line, precept upon precept, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little, here a little . . .
Brother, if you are right, you are AT BEST hoping that you have a little, much less a little more. There is no line upon line, except in your imagination. The precept is fantasy. Come on back to reality. You'll sleep better at night. You are wanting this to be true SO badly that you are willing to settle for a 50% chance of a hint of being right?
And of course there is the following . . .
Are ALL messengers pastors?
Or were nearly ALL messengers NOT pastors?
Tell the truth, and stay in the church.
Then there is this . . .
Should I call you on the fact that my Strongs Concordance defines angel as used in this passage as a messenger; esp. an "angel" ; by implication a pastor:- angel, messenger.
You are very close to being deceptive here. You really seem to want to add to the book of Revelation. Be careful!
Threaded Mode
