Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
This would make him some type of Oneness believer if he also believed Jesus Christ was that one God made flesh. He would have to affirm the deity of Christ. If he was Unitarian, then no, he would not be considered modalistic in any way.
|
But to link him to Modalist is wrong. He may claimed to believe in God as one person, like the Oneness doctrine does, but to use him to prove there were Oneness in History is desperate. And this is coming from a 2nd generation Oneness.
(I'm not attending any Oneness church now, which is a different story.)
Threaded Mode
