|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

12-27-2007, 09:07 PM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
Is this really a new topic for you? Arnold's book has been put down on these boards for longer than I've been around. Adino worked with Brother Arnold and assisted his research and has shared many insights.
Just from the top of my head:
He states that "Montanist were catagorized as Sabellians." But in reality Tertullian was a Montanist and wrote against Sabellianism. How could the Montanists be "Sabellians?" I sat in a room with you when a professor at UGST compared the Montanists to AoG. Do you remeber that?
Arnold states "Manichaenism revered Pentecost, Jesus name." He groups them with "other Oneness bodies" including the Bogomils. Manichaenism and Bogomils were both dualists. The didn't even believe that Jesus Christ had a physical body and they believed that the devil was a god on par with Jehovah!
Arnold states that the Bogomils, Albigensians, Cathari and many other medieval groups practiced Acts 2:38 salvation. But, he tells us, Rome lied about it and burned all of their books. None of that is true. In fact Google will take you to Albigensians texts. Read them for yourself and see if you would have fit in with their beliefs.
He states that "the Cathari - were people of the true Christian Church..." This "true church" forbade its people to marry or to consumate a marriage. They were mostly vegetarians and they believed that Jehovah was the "evil" god who created the material world but that the "son of light" had come to save us all from Jehovah/Yahweh. Is that what you preach?
|
You and I sat in 715 classes where the air temps were in the 40's and the discussion was not much I relished.
UGST? after my time.
I did some quick research, but knew if I asked- you would show here why this is not a reputable book. You did well for a dork who wore Hai Karate!
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|

12-27-2007, 09:08 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jekyll
This is interesting...
And at risk of more infractions or banning...I won't say what I really think. I mean, I tried, but...oh, never mind.
I applaud PP for having more tact than I did in this thread and for saying what others have been trying to say to no avail.
|
You be awfully funny.
Hey, where's Heckyl?
|

12-27-2007, 09:10 PM
|
 |
I need a Triple Espresso, NOW!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Standing at the crossroads of life!
Posts: 3,238
|
|
|
Pastor Poster
Why do you say you are not a conservative? In what ways do you differ from a conservative? i know it's off the topic but I am curious! Is it standards like hair and pants on women and beards on men? I'm not being sarcastic, but really just wanting to know.
__________________
I never met a chocolate I didn't like!
*sigh* I did nothing yesterday.... I wasn't finished so I did nothing again today!
|

12-27-2007, 09:13 PM
|
 |
Accepts all friends requests
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,609
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind
You and I sat in 715 classes where the air temps were in the 40's and the discussion was not much I relished.
UGST? after my time.
I did some quick research, but knew if I asked- you would show here why this is not a reputable book. You did well for a dork who wore Hai Karate!
|
He teaches or consults or whatever it is he does at UGST today, but back in the day he taught the lowly and the miserable huddled in their overcoats huffing one another's Hai Karate! to clear their beseiged sinuses.
|

12-27-2007, 09:21 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyChocolate
Pastor Poster
Why do you say you are not a conservative? In what ways do you differ from a conservative? i know it's off the topic but I am curious! Is it standards like hair and pants on women and beards on men? I'm not being sarcastic, but really just wanting to know.
|
Very conservative doctrinally.
Somewhat conservative in personal lifestlye.
Not so conservative in social standards.
To the ultracons I am a lib.
To the ultralibs I am a con.
To the world I am a right-wing fundamentalist whacko.
|

12-27-2007, 09:29 PM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
He teaches or consults or whatever it is he does at UGST today, but back in the day he taught the lowly and the miserable huddled in their overcoats huffing one another's Hai Karate! to clear their beseiged sinuses.
|
I have always wondered what became of the Omaha legend- you know- 25 cents for gas and he would go about anywhere....
What a character!
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|

12-27-2007, 09:31 PM
|
 |
I need a Triple Espresso, NOW!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Standing at the crossroads of life!
Posts: 3,238
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Very conservative doctrinally.
Somewhat conservative in personal lifestlye.
Not so conservative in social standards.
To the ultracons I am a lib.
To the ultralibs I am a con.
To the world I am a right-wing fundamentalist whacko.
|
see, i feel the same way about myself.... my veryconservative friends would think i had gone off the deep end and yet liberals out there for sure say i am a conservative.... do the women in your church keep the holiness standards of dress and of not cutting the hair? (this is a major impact on how one is labelled) do the men in your church wear shorts below the knee without any kind of reprimand? or can they wear just about anything? I am curious on where I would be compared to someone who thinks they stand where i stand ! LOL
__________________
I never met a chocolate I didn't like!
*sigh* I did nothing yesterday.... I wasn't finished so I did nothing again today!
|

12-27-2007, 09:31 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Very conservative doctrinally.
Somewhat conservative in personal lifestlye.
Not so conservative in social standards.
To the ultracons I am a lib.
To the ultralibs I am a con.
To the world I am a right-wing fundamentalist whacko.
|
This describes me with the exception of #1 (which I percieveth is code for 3 stepper)
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|

12-27-2007, 09:34 PM
|
 |
God's Son
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,743
|
|
The word apostolic is laughable itself. It is the closest thing to acceptable idolatry in our circles.
The only thing the Oneness revelation proves is one is at least as smart as devils. ( James 2:19)
We are called to be disciples. Not christians, not apostolics, not oneness pentecostals. Labels are for self preservation.
We've lost sight of discipleship and replaced it with irrelevant labels. Instead of discipling people to be like christ, we disciple them to be religious.
We are so concerned about our beliefs we lose sight of what makes a person a disciple of Christ.
L-O-V-E.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster
Also, there is no way any trinitarian site/forum would have been as lenient as AFF has been. IMO admin needs to rein this junk in.
We need to make up our minds. Are we Oneness Pentecostal or not?
And the idea that this alternative group is somehow "Apostolic" is laughable.
|
__________________
A religious spirit allows people to tolerate hatred and anger under the guise of passion and holiness. Bill Johnson
Legalism has no pity on people. Legalism makes my opinion your burden, makes opinion your boundary, makes my opinion your obligation-Lucado
Some get spiritual because they see the light. Others because they feel the heat.Ray Wylie Hubbard
Definition of legalism- Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. TV
|

12-27-2007, 09:43 PM
|
 |
Guest
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tv1a
The word apostolic is laughable itself. It is the closest thing to acceptable idolatry in our circles.
The only thing the Oneness revelation proves is one is at least as smart as devils. ( James 2:19)
We are called to be disciples. Not christians, not apostolics, not oneness pentecostals. Labels are for self preservation.
We've lost sight of discipleship and replaced it with irrelevant labels. Instead of discipling people to be like christ, we disciple them to be religious.
We are so concerned about our beliefs we lose sight of what makes a person a disciple of Christ.
L-O-V-E.
|
tv1a I am not surprised you would mock Apostolics.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM.
| |