Agenda Driven or Accepting of Diversity?

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

I have friends who believe in doctrines that I feel are false and will cause their hides to be thrown in a devil's hell, but we talk and hang out with each other. We also have dinner together and argue with each other and still have respect for one another. We all have to draw a line when it comes to the pulpit and I have no hard feelings for those who would not preach me because what I believe concerning Eschatology. I cannot allow anyone to get behind the pulpit if they don't hold to water baptism in Jesus name only, and the infilling of the Holy Ghost with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues as a MUST HAVE.

I don't play when it comes to receiving the Holy Ghost with the initial evidence of tongues and Jesus name baptism. I don't go for the compromise of baptizing in the titles father, son, and spirit, and saying the name of Jesus Christ after you spoke each of the titles. That is weak as the water in which the person is dunked in.

I believe in holiness or hell, and that's the way it is, so sue me.

Everyone can still have pizza together and have good discussions, we might no be able to preach each other, but hey, that doesn't make us not able to sit down and shoot the breeze.

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

While I'm mainly talking about other 'Apostolics' who differ on various issues I have to admit that I pretty much agree with this whole post... except that whole eschatology stuff that you're confused about.

I agree, I can't open my pulpit to someone who doesn't believe the truth about the New Birth. It's a 'must have' in my heart of hearts.