Spitzer Spritzer

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by TRFrance

Her Myspace page got over a 1 million hits the first 8 hours after her identity was published.

But I just went back and checked.
She deleted her account.

The poor girl.

For the sake of accuracy, just wanted to say the young lady's page is back up, receiving almost 4 million hits the past 24 hours.

I still think the poor girl is a mess. Nobody is prepared to be thrust into the limelight so suddenly, especially under such circumstances.

[ChristopherHall]

Originally Posted by Rico

Maybe she actually believes in "til death do us part" and is willing to forgive her husband. Have any of you "Christian" women considered that?

You will notice that most Christians behave as though the Bible commands divorce in response to adultery. I fear most Christians would cheer her on if she "let him have it" and left him. But God tells us plainly....

"16For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously." - Malachi 2:16

[ChristopherHall]

Originally Posted by Dora

Did you hear how young the girls were? Barely 18! Makes me furious! Just little kids!

Nothing makes me angrier than the porn industry, it's slavery in its worst form.

And glossing over the reality of the horror and degradation it causes all over the globe is sickening.

Amen sis.

[ChristopherHall]

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

What's wrong with you people!?!?! We bash Spitzer when he does something morally wrong, we re-elect Clinton when he does something wrong! LOL! We need help in this country. *okay, I'm done*

Clinton had an affair, got scared and lied about it. Clinton's issue is viewed by many as being a tragic sin but not a crime. It can be argued that his only crime was lying under oath...to protect his political image and his marriage.

Spitzer hired a prostitute and tried to hide the financial transactions using another person's name in efforts not to tip off any financial monitors. The prostitute is illegal and the financial dealings unethical.

So in a way Spitzer's case is worse.

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by ChristopherHall

Clinton had an affair, got scared and lied about it. Clinton's issue is viewed by many as being a tragic sin but not a crime. It can be argued that his only crime was lying under oath...to protect his political image and his marriage.

Spitzer hired a prostitute and tried to hide the financial transactions using another person's name in efforts not to tip off any financial monitors. The prostitute is illegal and the financial dealings unethical.

So in a way Spitzer's case is worse.

Chris, you never cease to amaze me. How is Spitzer worse than Clinton? They were both involved in immoral sexual activity.....duh! You probably believe that Clinton didn't inhale either. Yep, I'm convinced, yer a piece of work.

[Monkeyman]

Originally Posted by ChristopherHall

Clinton had an affair, got scared and lied about it. Clinton's issue is viewed by many as being a tragic sin but not a crime. It can be argued that his only crime was lying under oath...to protect his political image and his marriage.

Spitzer hired a prostitute and tried to hide the financial transactions using another person's name in efforts not to tip off any financial monitors. The prostitute is illegal and the financial dealings unethical.

So in a way Spitzer's case is worse.

Oh myyyyy, serious dude? You don't think President Clinton didn't have an arrangement with his wife to be able to philander for a lot of his political career? There are women who say differently, one has a phone tape....whatever dude. As far as punishable crime? Sure, I will give you that, but they are both on the same level of sleaziness!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by ChristopherHall

Clinton had an affair, got scared and lied about it. Clinton's issue is viewed by many as being a tragic sin but not a crime. It can be argued that his only crime was lying under oath...to protect his political image and his marriage.

Spitzer hired a prostitute and tried to hide the financial transactions using another person's name in efforts not to tip off any financial monitors. The prostitute is illegal and the financial dealings unethical.

So in a way Spitzer's case is worse.

Christopher,
Clinton said he did what he did because he could. Not much difference for either party.

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by Monkeyman

Oh myyyyy, serious dude? You don't think President Clinton didn't have an arrangement with his wife to be able to philander for a lot of his political career? There are women who say differently, one has a phone tape....whatever dude. As far as punishable crime? Sure, I will give you that, but they are both on the same level of sleaziness!

Speculation and rumor.
You cant prove that.

[Barb]

There is a situation here with the mayor of a large city in our state...

It is quite a deal and involved, but it appears that there has been a long history of partying and such at the mayor's mansion.

However, the major deal seems to be this...from the Associated Press...

"In a trial over a lawsuit against the city brought by two police officers who said they were wrongfully fired (they were investigating money matters and more), (the mayor and his former top aide) denied under oath that they had been romantically involved."

The crux is that sexually explicit text messages have been made quite public, showing that at the time they were testifying, they were deeply involved sexually. The transcripts have been shown and read repeatedly on radio, tv, and in newspapers.

The prosecutor is "deciding whether to charge (them) with perjury."

Seems to me it's a no-brainer...if they lied under oath, that's a crime.

On top of all of that, city funds were used, it appears, for hush money purposes, and deals under the table have been...and possibly much more...every day it seems there is a new development.

But through it all, the man stands strong that this is between he and his wife, and he refuses to resign, calling it, "lynch-mob tactics."

It's ridiculous...there has to be accountability for sin, regardless of who it is in...president, governor, mayor...whomever it may be.

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by Barb

There is a situation here with the mayor of a large city in our state...

It is quite a deal and involved, but it appears that there has been a long history of partying and such at the mayor's mansion.

However, the major deal seems to be this...from the Associated Press...

"In a trial over a lawsuit against the city brought by two police officers who said they were wrongfully fired (they were investigating money matters and more), (the mayor and his former top aide) denied under oath that they had been romantically involved."

The crux is that sexually explicit text messages have been made quite public, showing that at the time they were testifying, they were deeply involved sexually. The transcripts have been shown and read repeatedly on radio, tv, and in newspapers.

The prosecutor is "deciding whether to charge (them) with perjury."

Seems to me it's a no-brainer...if they lied under oath, that's a crime.

On top of all of that, city funds were used, it appears, for hush money purposes, and deals under the table have been...and possibly much more...every day it seems there is a new development.

But through it all, the man stands strong that this is between he and his wife, and he refuses to resign, calling it, "lynch-mob tactics."

It's ridiculous...there has to be accountability for sin, regardless of who it is in...president, governor, mayor...whomever it may be.

It's very obvious he committed perjury. I don't know what the prosecutor is hemming and hawing about.

And there are serious questions about who killed a stripper who had been linked to a party at his mansion. Who know's what'll turn up if investigators look under that rug.