Quote:
Originally Posted by Margies3
All I know is that I've found 2 of my fellow AFF'ers who I never, ever want to get in a car with.
When you say that you can understand how the man could get angry enough to shoot at someone who ran him off the road, 1) does that also mean that you could understand how someone could get angry enough to shoot their spouse because they overdrew the bank account?
2) I'm not saying the other driver was in the right. But 3) NOTHING justifies that kind of violence against another person. NOTHING! If he gets angry enough when something like this happens that he can't control himself and has to shoot the other person,then he doesn't belong on the road himself. 4) If he can't control himself, he has no business driving.
|
1) No Ma'am it just means that I can understand how the man could get angry enough to shoot at someone who ran him off the road.
2) I am not saying the shooter was right either.
3) I disagree with you here. I'm not saying that violence was the acceptable response here. In fact, I have already stated that gun violence was not acceptable for this situation.
But I can think of situations where gun violence would be the appropriate response.
I have the Bible to back me up on this too.
4) So we can not give this guy the benefit of doubt? Maybe he was having a bad day. Maybe he needs some anger management counseling. Maybe he's a war veteran.
How quick are we to demonize this guy, when if the so called "victim" had just been more considerate, this would not have happened.